|
Last
week, Washington was chattering about the unclassified version of the
latest National Intelligence Estimate or NIE. These days, the NIE is
the product of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies. Like the committee
appointed to improve upon the horse and comes up with the camel, the
NIE offers an ungainly, something-for-everyone.
Those who want vigorous prosecution of our defense against
attacks by radical Islam, found support for their views because the NIE
says our armed forces have, post-9/11, done serious damage to al-Qaeda.
Those who take the position that fighting back in Iraq and Afghanistan
causes al-Qaeda to gain more jihadist recruits, found support for
saying: “I told you so.”
Having served our nation for a time as a “spook,” it is
painful to assert the need to disband the CIA and start all over. But
that’s what is needed.
Yes, we need “spooks” to gather information about both enemy
and friendly capabilities and intentions. Yes, we need analysts to
process that information and produce intelligence to be presented to
the President and his national security staff for their consideration.
Stop. That’s it. We do not need personnel in the CIA or the
State Department who think it is their job to determine national
foreign and defense policy. Article II of our Constitution clearly
assigns the decision-making role to the President, not to the Congress,
not to the Judiciary and certainly not to intelligence agencies not
even mentioned in the Constitution.
Unfortunately, civil service rules (no one can be fired
without an act of God) and government whistle-blower protections have
spawned individuals within the intelligence community who, if their
views do not become national policy, go leaking their pet ideas to
certain members of Congress and/or to selected media outlets.
Moreover, the CIA intelligence personnel pyramid is inverted.
Instead of a broad base of field agents at the bottom and a small cadre
of field-experienced analysts and managers at the tiny, pointed top of
the pyramid, we have just the reverse.
Each morning, some 20,000 non-covert CIA employees (a la
Valerie Plame) pour onto the CIA’s 258-acre, college-like campus in
Langley, Virginia. Out in the field at diplomatic posts or under
non-official cover, are another 20,000 or so CIA case officers and
agents.
The Armed Services have their own intelligence branches. The
Pentagon has its Defense Intelligence Agency. The National Security
Agency (NSA) provides vital communications data. Another agency
provides satellite and other high-altitude over-flight data. All of
those agencies provide useful raw information.
But the truth is that every major piece of world-shaking
intelligence the CIA should have reported to the White House was either
not reported or, if so, was ignored by the Presidents who could have
acted upon it. Here are just two examples:
1. Well prior to the erection of the Berlin Wall in August,
1961, tons of intelligence were sent to the Kennedy White House that
the East Germans were about to erect a concrete and barbed-wire curtain
around and through Berlin. President Kennedy failed to act on solid
intelligence and then acted surprised when the Wall went up. (He even
muffed his grandstanding speech to the Berliners he let be walled-off
when he said, “Ich bin ein Berliner,” (I’m a jelly donut). He should have said, “Ich bin Berliner,” meaning he declared himself a fellow citizen of Berlin).
2. In 2003, President Bush was told by then CIA Director, George
Tenet, that Saddam Hussein’s possession of WMD was a “slam-dunk”, he
could, “take to the bank.” Ultimately, history will rule if Bush was
correct or incorrect in deposing Saddam. But he did so based, in part,
on faulty WMD intelligence.
The best chance to reform the CIA came when President Bush
appointed former CIA case officer and former Congressman, Porter Goss,
to be CIA Director. But the CIA bureaucracy undermined Goss and, to his
discredit, President Bush asked Goss to step down.
Until the CIA is fixed, we are, as we used to say in South Korea, “In deep Kimchi.”
Syndicated columnist and featured commentator for USA Today,
William Hamilton, is a Distinguished Graduate of the U.S. Naval War
College and a former research fellow at the U.S. Military History
Institute of the U.S. Army War College. He is a member of the
Association of Former Intelligence Officers. He is also the co-author
of The Grand Conspiracy and The Panama Conspiracy – two thrillers about
terrorism directed against the United States.
©2007. William Hamilton.
|